"I am not a political playwright. A political play is about informing. I don't do that." - Barker
If the play's purpose is outside of religion, and social ideas, this puts all of the focus on the emotional decision of Judith to kill (not only kill, but violently decapitate) Holofemes. Barker added an element of conflicted emotioal attatchment in his retelling of the biblical story. I wanted to highlight this choice as well. That being said, I chose a dramatic question "Will Judith put her people before her feelings of connection with Holofemes." This raises a more passionate question, and focusses on the true heightened circumstances of the play. Judith is compromising her body and morals, and risking her life to take someone else's; all for the sake of her opressed people. What form will her passion take?
Source: http://www.jewishjournal.com/arts/article/judith_the_woman_warrior_who_brought_down_a_general_20061123
Source: http://www.jewishjournal.com/arts/article/judith_the_woman_warrior_who_brought_down_a_general_20061123
That's a really cool take on it. I agree with your rationale of thinking, that once Barker said there's no political ties, it becomes less teaching and trying to prove a point and more of an emotional story. To back up your MDQ, a really pivotal moment where Judith's choice between her people and Holofernes waivers is when she tries to have sex with his corpse. You think she has chosen the side of her people, but for a moment, she doubts herself, thinking she's made the wrong decision and is trying to fix it. But with the help of her servant, she instead firmly chooses to step up, take back her power and control, and return to her people. Very interesting way of looking at the play.
ReplyDelete